Dein erstes Forum » moters know this; in fact, they feast on this. But

Glenn Maxwell has compared the Indian batsmens approach unfavourably to the Australians when nearing a milestone, but Cricket Australia have been quick to do damage control.It began after the third ODI in Melbourne with a question quoting Matthew Hayden from 10 years ago. Maxwell, who had scored a match-winning 96 in that match, was noncommittal in response but before the Sydney ODI, he eliminated the doubts around what he said.They were probably just making sure they got to a milestone, Maxwell had said in Melbourne. Some people are milestone-driven, some people arent. If it means that much to you, you go for it. But its not something that drives me too much. Each to their own.In Sydney though, Maxwell went from generic to specific. He told Wisden India: I knew it [the comment] was going to blow up. It didnt really bother me. I was sent a photo the other day, it said Virat was 84 off 63, and then 100 off 89 or something like that. He got his last 11 runs off 22 balls to get his hundred. I thought about that and I was like, Jeez, he did it so easily all the way up until then, and then you just lose a bit of momentum. I have been thinking about that.Then you look on the other hand, when you watch David Warner get into the 90s and he tries to hit Ishant Sharma for a slog sweep for six. Its just, to me, thats two complete different ends of the spectrum. And then you look at the scoreline and you see 4-0. And to me, Id much rather be 4-0 basically.Maxwell said his side didnt care about milestones. The way Boof [Darren Lehmann, the coach] has talked to us always has been: Take the game on, take the game on, take the game on. I dont care if youre on 90, I dont care if youre on zero, take the game on.Cricket Australia and BCCI enjoy a fruitful relationship under the new Big Three arrangement. CAs website was quick to do an interview with Maxwell to clarify his statements, but he didnt quite take them back.Maxwell would, however, tweet that they were taken out of context and said he was in awe of how Kohli almost single-handedly chased down 349 in Canberra.I was asked to give a bit of an assessment of who was dominating with the bat in this series, and I said, I dont think anyone in the world is hitting the ball better than Virat at the moment, Maxwell told cricket.com.au.The point that I was making, and it related more to when India were setting totals and had plenty of wickets in hand, is that the scoring rate seemed to slow as milestones got close, which can sometimes be the case, especially when teams are batting first.Maintaining a constant scoring rate can be less straightforward batting first than when youre chasing and you know what the required rate has to be, and there have been times when batters just seem to have slowed a bit to make sure they reach those milestones. Sometimes that wins you games, and sometimes it doesnt but that was the only point I was trying to make. Ive got a really good relationship with Virat off the field, and Ive already had a chat with him.The clarification doesnt make it disappear that he compared the Indian batsmens efforts with that of Warner, who too, was setting a total and got out in the 90s trying to play a big shot.Steven Smith, Australias captain, said the slowing down near a milestone was natural. I think that can be natural for anyone around the world, Smith said. When you see that sort of milestone coming, in the back of your mind you might slow down a little bit. I think Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma are quality players and theyre batting beautifully, and I dont see any problem with any selfishness there.Aaron Finch distanced himself from Maxwells comments. The talk of Indian players being selfish was obviously Glenns view; thats not my personal view, Finch said. Virat Kohli got a 100 off 80-odd balls the other day. There was nothing selfish about that innings. That was an extraordinary, extraordinary innings. Shikhar Dhawan got it off about 95 balls, I think. He took the game on at the start for India along with Rohit, and got them off to an absolute flyer. Gee, there are some seriously good players in India. Virat… 25 ODI hundreds now. Thats an unbelievable achievement.In the three ODIs that India batted first, they scored 67, 67 and 60 from overs 31 to 40. These have been the overs when their set batsmen have approached their hundreds. In Perth, Rohit took 24 balls from 83 at the start of the 31st over to reach his century. Similarly in Brisbane, between the 30th and the 40th overs, Rohit took 21 balls to move from 86 to 100. Virat Kohli took 15 balls to score the last 16 runs to his century between the 38th and 43rd overs in Melbourne.Team director Ravi Shastri, though, had defended his men before the Canberra ODI. If they were focusing on milestones, Virat Kohli wouldnt have been the fastest to 7000 runs; he would have taken another 100 games, Shastri said. If that was the case, Rohit Sharma would not be having two double hundreds, and a score of 264. Discount Air Jordan 1 Retro . Andreas Johnson had a goal and two assists while Jacob de la Rose also scored for Sweden (2-0-0). Esa Lindell and Rasmus Ristolainen replied for Finland (1-1-0) Lindell opened the scoring for Finland just 41 seconds into the game, but the hosts quickly regained their composure and tied the score less than four minutes later on Wennbergs first of the game. Air Jordan 1 Retro 2019 . Inter president Erick Thohir says in a club statement on Wednesday that Vidic is "one of the worlds best defenders and his qualities, international pedigree, and charisma will be an asset. http://www.cheapairjordan1retro.com/ . The catch: It needs a lot of money, and it needs it fast. Supply Air Jordan 1 Retro . -- Josh Sterk scored once and set up two more as the Oshawa Generals edged the visiting Belleville Bulls 3-2 on Friday in Ontario Hockey League action. Black Air Jordan 1 Retro . LOUIS -- St. There was a lingering feeling in the pit of my stomach during Saturdays Canelo Alvarez-Liam Smith bout that was hard to ignore and was probably best summed up in this tweet.Boxing fans should demand more from their favorite sport. This new norm is heartbreaking.- Brian Campbell (@BCampbellESPN) September 18, 2016Cynical fans on social media were quick to remind that this new norm wasnt that far removed from what we have experienced as a whole over the past decade. While in most cases thats true, with boxings many shortcomings having long become accepted by its worn down and underserved fan base.But if were being honest when looking at 2016 as a whole, its difficult to overlook that this is just about as bad as it gets. Already successful at running off casual fans thanks to its broken system, boxing is now threatening to do the same to its backbone of hard-core fans -- the same ones who defend (and most importantly fund) the sports slow decay.Here was Alvarez, the Mexican superstar and de facto face of the sport, headlining a pay-per-view no one asked for against a little known and overmatched opponent. The only thing at stake outside of Alvarez and promoter Oscar De La Hoya lining their own pockets was the trinket of a 154-pound title Smith had captured despite not having a signature victory of any kind.The fight also took place in a division in which Alvarez -- the sports lineal middleweight champion, no less -- has no interest in competing in. Even the undercard played down to its dismally low level of expectations.Afterward, both Alvarez and De La Hoya spun narratives of half-truths while attempting to put off for another year the superfight that should have already taken place -- Alvarezs showdown with unified middleweight titlist Gennady Golovkin -- to a time when Triple G will conveniently be closer to age 36 and fans will be worn out from the journey getting there.While Alvarez and De La Hoya arent exclusively to blame for boxings deeper dive into irrelevance in 2016, their unrepentant heel turn is discouraging when you consider their history for giving fans what they want and deserve.But during a calendar year in which nearly all parties involved have put their own immediate financial needs in front of the long-term health of the sport, its becoming increasingly difficult for fans to separate the heroes from the villains.This isnt the every other year phenomenon that has recently plagued the sport, with both 2012 (drug suspensions, promotional cold war) and 2014 (well ... everything)?proving awful, only for the sport to rebound spectacularly in 2013 (great fights, healthy competition between HBO and Showtime) and 2015 (launch of PBC, Floyd Mayweather-Manny Pacquiao buzz).This is much worse, with years of disturbing trends finally escalating to the level of an epidemic. This is an entire sport taking the path of least resistance in hopes of creating a spark for that one great fight on the horizon, only to then milk it for all its worth with bait-and-switch tactics in the buildup.Sound familiar? Its Mayweather-Pacquiao all over again, which is something De La Hoya is clearly looking to replicate with Golovkin-Alvarez. But the flippant way in which hes testing the patience of his own customers during a time when boxing no longer has the collateral to do so is short-sighted, especially after so many casual fans -- the ones needed to sell large numbers of PPVs -- vowed to never be fooled again after the $100 dud last May.Instead, 2016s biggest fights have been a series of glorified mismatches and gratuitous rematches, making boxing feel more like a touring rock concert than an actual competition, with top superstars being paid handsomely to play their hits in fights designed to make them look good. Watching Alvarez croon his adoring crowd of 50,000-plus fans at the cavernous AT&T Stadium in Arlinggton, Texas, very much felt the same way, which was probably by design.dddddddddddd.Alvarez has become just another imitator of the dangerous precedent set by Mayweather, who repeatedly leveraged his sublime talent and marketability into a series of low-risk marquee fights for large rewards. Its a business model designed by Mayweathers adviser and PBC creator Al Haymon, who lets not forget came to boxing fresh off his success as a giant in which avenue? Yes, the concert promotion business.Its the same copycat model being attempted by PBC fighters like Adonis Stevenson, Danny Garcia and Adrien Broner, with each one gaining an inflated sense of financial worth after being overpaid for showcase fights, providing them with literally millions of reasons to outright avoid the dangerous ones.Its one thing for only one of boxings top stars to consistently match himself disproportionate to his talent level, as fans had endured with Mayweather in recent years. But when it quickly becomes nearly every big name in the sport, making fights that matter becomes impossible.Gone is the fantasy that if casual fans, who only came around twice per year to complain how boring and expensive a Mayweather pay-per-view fight was, would just watch the sport on the other 50 weekends each year, they would be hooked. Not in 2016.Not with HBO, long the gold standard for boxing on premium pay cable, handcuffed with budget issues, forcing one non-deserving fight after another to the PPV level. And not with PBC largely refusing to match its best against each other in cards not funded by Showtime/CBS, while constantly flooding the market on other networks with fights not worthy of being televised.Even the one fight that truly matters above all this year -- the Nov. 19 showdown for pound-for-pound supremacy between unified light heavyweight titlist Sergey Kovalev and Andre Ward -- has been saddled with an unnecessary year-long buildup in which both fighters looked underwhelming in tune-up bouts, robbing from the potential crossover buzz.The sport has done well to fight off the constant boxing is dead hysteria in recent years by providing its hardened regulars with just enough reminders as to why they fell in love in the first place, despite constant obstacles like big-name promoters proving unwilling to work with each other.The reason is because boxings almost arrogant resiliency takes root within a singular reality that remains true: When its operating at its best, no other sport can provide an equal high or summon as deep an emotional reaction as boxing. In fact, its not even close.In that regard, boxing is an addiction for most true fans that is very hard to quit. Promoters know this; in fact, they feast on this. But its an abusive relationship at best, especially in 2016. And when theres little payoff to be found for the fans whose hard-earned pay keep the sport moving, soon enough theres little reason to tune in.Its heartbreaking to know that your favorite sport must complete its decades-long fall before it can ever truly be fixed.Its very likely that 2016 wont be that year, despite the many problems that boxing remains embroiled in. But it would be nice if those in power woke up to the reality of the sports sinking-ship existence and spent less time preparing their own lifeboat.It would be just as nice for fans to finally use their voice in the only true manner that affects change -- with their wallet -- and stop accepting the status quo.Alvarez-Smith wasnt the only thing thats wrong with boxing in 2016, but its surely a microcosm of the path of least resistance trend that is further distancing this once great sport from the potential that still exists, buried deep within the ruins of its own remains. ' ' '